by scharles » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:35 pm
ATSupport,
You wrote you recommend the i290 over the i335, the reason you gave was that the i290 has battery level and signal level data reported on the tracking map. If you remember the i855 had battery level reported on the tracking map as well, but it was horrible when it came to tracking. The signals were always low and stuff. The i425 is much better compared to the i855 when it comes to the tracking. I hope you read my previous message. What I want to know is which phone out of the two (i290 and i335) is better for tracking. It doesn't matter if the i290 has more features like battery and signal level reported on the map if the tracking is not stable. Is the i290 just as stable as the i425? Or is the i335 better than the i290 when it comes to stability of the tracking?
I want to know which phone (i290 or i335) is best, stable, as good as the i425 when it comes to tracking.
I hope you have tested the i290 and i335 and can give me an accurate reply here.
Thanks.
ATSupport,
You wrote you recommend the i290 over the i335, the reason you gave was that the i290 has battery level and signal level data reported on the tracking map. If you remember the i855 had battery level reported on the tracking map as well, but it was horrible when it came to tracking. The signals were always low and stuff. The i425 is much better compared to the i855 when it comes to the tracking. I hope you read my previous message. What I want to know is which phone out of the two (i290 and i335) is better for tracking. It doesn't matter if the i290 has more features like battery and signal level reported on the map if the tracking is not stable. Is the i290 just as stable as the i425? Or is the i335 better than the i290 when it comes to stability of the tracking?
I want to know which phone (i290 or i335) is best, stable, as good as the i425 when it comes to tracking.
I hope you have tested the i290 and i335 and can give me an accurate reply here.
Thanks.